The small boats conundrum has come to sharp public focus this week as a proposal by Keir Starmer, leader of the Labour Party, generated intense debate in the UK. While the political left and right tear at each other on how best to address the unrelenting crossings on the English Channel, climate visa is engaging the conversation in climate change circles.
Broadly, there are several sides to the raging debate. A school of thought holds that, in the face of the escalating impact of climate change globally, the UK government must extend its support beyond financial aid to vulnerable nations to include a willingness to accept climate-induced migration. The argument hinges on the belief that, as a global leader, the UK has a moral duty to assist vulnerable communities in coping with the consequences of climate-related disasters, especially given the fact that wealthy countries like her bear significant responsibility for the triggers. The concept of “climate visas” is now being proposed for individuals seeking refuge in the UK due to climate change’s impact.
A climate visa is an internationally acknowledged permit that allows individuals residing in regions severely affected by climate-related stressors to legally migrate to another country. Proponents of this idea, prominent among which is Onward, a UK Conservative think tank, hope to address the pressing challenges posed by the climate crisis and global migration. They argue that climate visas serve a dual purpose: firstly, as a humanitarian response, they provide refuge to individuals displaced by natural disasters and long-term climate stresses. Secondly, they facilitate the entry of skilled workers crucial for the UK’s transition to a net-zero economy.
Climate migration as an undeniable concern
Climate migration has become a significant global concern, particularly affecting developed economies. This type of migration refers to the situation where individuals are compelled to abandon their residences and communities due to the adverse impacts of climate change. This displacement is primarily triggered by factors like extreme weather events, rising sea levels, droughts, and food shortages, and it is on an upward trajectory. Projections indicate that in the coming decades, potentially millions, if not billions, of people will be confronted with the necessity of forced relocation.
The Institute for Economics and Peace, a think tank specializing in evaluating the economic implications of global peace, has projected that approximately 1.2 billion people in 31 different countries lack the capacity to endure the escalating threats brought about by climate change. Such susceptibility may result in internal population displacement and cross-border migration, which could have extensive consequences for both developed and developing nations. Additionally, many of the areas expected to be most severely affected by climate change are also experiencing substantial population growth, compounding the challenge of extensive migration and a potential increase in global refugees.
Alarming statistics from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) shed light on the scale of a pressing global issue: climate migration. Between 2008 and 2016, an annual average of 21.5 million people found themselves forcibly displaced due to climate-related factors, resulting in a staggering total of over 318 million displacements since 2008. Furthermore, data show that approximately 500 million to 600 million individuals, which is close to 10% of the global population, face the threat of being displaced due to the impacts of climate change. Presently, around 26 million have already been compelled to relocate, a number that is anticipated to escalate to 150 million by the year 2050. These numbers, no doubt, demand attention but does it justify climate visas as a panacea to the small boats?
Featured image sourced from The Guardian
Found it interesting and would like more in the mail?
